Navigating Workers' Compensation: Your Role in Prosecution Outcomes

Outcomes of Workers' Compensation Prosecutions 

The Workers' Compensation Regulator is tasked with investigating and initiating legal actions for alleged violations of the Workers' Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 (the Act). This responsibility is entrusted to the Office of Industrial Relations.

Workers' compensation insurers are obligated to provide the Office of Industrial Relations with pertinent information in their possession that substantiates a reasonable belief that an individual has committed an offense.

Offenses under the Act encompass various violations, such as fraud or attempted fraud, furnishing false or deceptive statements or documents, acquiring or utilizing a worker's compensation document for purposes related to employment, failure to establish written rehabilitation policies and procedures when mandated, termination of an injured worker within 12 months of injury, and assuming the identity of an authorized person.

Investigations and legal proceedings may be initiated against any individual, including a worker/claimant, employer, service provider, or any other individual or business.

Workers' compensation prosecutions:

28/07/2023 Beenleigh

Hearing date: 28 July 2023

Magistrates court: Beenleigh Magistrates Court – Magistrate Clohessy

Outcome:

  • Penalty
    • Charge 1 – Fraud:
      • 6 months imprisonment wholly suspended for an operational period of 12 months.
    • Charge 2 – Failure to notify insurer of engagement in a calling:
      • Convicted and not further punished.

The worker failed to notify the insurer of their engagement in a calling by not disclosing unpaid work they undertook while receiving compensation.

Date28 July 2023
Charges

Charge 1 – Fraud – s 533, 535 – Workers’ Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003
Charge 2 – Failure to notify insurer of engagement in a calling – s 136 – Workers’ Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003
Charges 3 to 7 – False or misleading information – s 534 – Workers’ Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003

CourtBeenleigh Magistrates Court – Magistrate Clohessy
Plea

Guilty to Charges 1 and 2
Charges 2 – 7 discontinued

Case

The worker failed to notify the insurer of their engagement in a calling by not disclosing unpaid work they undertook while receiving compensation.

Facts

On 15 December 2020, the worker sustained injuries to their neck, right upper limb and right ankle as a result of a physical altercation at his workplace.

On 17 December 2020, the worker lodged a claim for compensation which was accepted. During the claim, the worker was certified not to have any capacity for any type of work.

On 10, 19 and 23 February 2021, surveillance was undertaken of the worker which revealed that they were engaged in physical tasks at a workplace and undertaking truck driving.

The worker failed to disclose this (unpaid) work to the insurer during the period 10 February and 17 March 2021, while also in receipt of compensation for injuries and deemed unfit for all work.

Following negotiations between the parties, the worker pleaded guilty to fraud and failing to notify of engagement in a calling on the day prior to trial and charges 3 to 7 were discontinued.

Penalty

Charge 1 – Fraud:

  • 6 months imprisonment wholly suspended for an operational period of 12 months.

Charge 2 – Failure to notify insurer of engagement in a calling:

  • Convicted and not further punished.
Restitution$10,020.98 referred to SPER
Costs$17,238.17 referred to SPER
Common Law rights extinguished?Yes
ConvictionRecorded
Consideration for Prevention

Workers must be honest about their engagement in work (paid or unpaid), including self-employment, during their claim for compensation.


12/06/2023 Southport

Hearing date: 12 June 2023

Magistrates court: Southport Magistrates Court – Magistrate Pink

Outcome:

  • Penalty
    • Charge 1 – 4 months imprisonment, wholly suspended for 12 months

The worker returned to work during statutory claim and did not advise the insurer and lied to the insurer and doctors when asked about the work.

Date12 June 2023
Charges

Charge 1 – s 533/535 Workers’ Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 – Fraud
Charge 2 – s534 Workers’ Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 – Providing false information
Charge 3 - s534 Workers’ Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 – Providing false information

CourtSouthport Magistrates Court – Magistrate Pink
Plea

Guilty to charge 1 only
Charges 2 and 3 discontinued

Case

The worker returned to work during statutory claim and did not advise the insurer and lied to the insurer and doctors when asked about the work.

Facts

The worker was employed as a Frozen Goods Manager when they slipped and hurt their knee. The worker lodged a workers’ compensation claim which was accepted.  Some months into the claim, they commenced work as a truck driver for another company.  They didn’t advise the insurer of this work at the time.  The worker also continued to attend on their General Practitioner to obtain Work Capacity Medical Certificates which certified them unfit for all work and provided those to the insurer. They did not tell their GP they were working as a truck driver. They also attended a medical specialist for an independent medical examination and did not tell the specialist about the work.

When the insurer became aware of the work and asked the worker to provide details of all income received, including payslips, the worker lied and said they had started in the role approximately six weeks after they actually commenced work as a truck driver.

Penalty

Charge 1 – 4 months imprisonment, wholly suspended for 12 months

Restitution$12,206.30 (all repaid prior to sentence)
Costs$2,500.00
Common Law rights extinguished?Yes
ConvictionRecorded
Consideration for Prevention

A worker should tell the insurer if they return to work during their claim. A worker should be honest about their capacity for work when talking to the insurer and doctors.


Charge/sOutcome
1 charge of engaging in a callingWorker found guilty at trial.
Placed on 12 months' probation and ordered to pay $30,029.87 in
1 charge of engaging in a calling
1 charge of attempting to defraud
Worker found guilty.
Fined $1,000 and ordered to pay court costs of $1,220 and of $256.
1 charge of fraud
6 charges of providing false and misleading information to a self-insurer
Worker found guilty at trial.
Sentenced to six months imprisonment and ordered to pay $60,000 in.
4 charges of providing false and misleading information to a self-insurerWorker pleaded guilty
Fined $1,000 and ordered to pay court costs of $1,220 and of $256.
2 charges of providing false and misleading information to a self-insurerWorker pleaded guilty.
Sentenced to a 1 year good behaviour bond.
replica uhren replica horloges